The media has had a field day going over the details. Not only is this a sex scandal, it’s an expenses scandal to boot. Not only is she a powerful figure in Northern Irish politics, but she’s also caused offence with her comments on homosexuality. There’s been fleeting sympathy over her depression and the resulting suicide attempt, but all in all the relish with which she has been torn down certainly bears some resemblance to the mob that came before Jesus.

In contrast to the media, the Bible is scant on the details of its story. We don’t know whether the woman in question was young or old, rich or poor, influential or powerless. Hollywood has tended to portray her as young and sexy, but actually we’re told precious little. It’s unlikely her moral failings would have destabilised the region, but she may have been rich. And she may have been old - older even. She may even have been powerful, although only powerful enough to attract enemies, not powerful enough to keep them at bay.

John’s lack of detail is not so much so that we can fill them in for ourselves, but to highlight the facts in the story that really count. It matters not about the woman’s background, what Jesus wrote in the ground, or even the absence of the man she was committing adultery with. We’re not even told whether she does, in the end, “go and sin no more” or not.

I like to think that this is because, in the end, what really matters in this story is Jesus’ compassion. When he looked he didn’t see the woman’s moral failings, her mistakes, her hypocrisy. He just saw her as a person. Given the extremes of this case, it’s certainly an uncomfortable comparison. Yet whilst few will be calling for Iris Robinson to be allowed to carry on as normal, it’s difficult to see a single reason why Jesus would have treated her any differently than that unnamed woman almost two thousand years ago.

Back to the top
Bookmark this post:          

Your comments